<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel>
<title>Perette's Journal</title>
<link>http://perette.barella.org/Journal</link>
<description>The latest rumblings from Perette's head</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<webMaster>perette@barella.org (Perette Barella)</webMaster>
<generator>diary $</generator>
<docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
<managingEditor>perette@barella.org (Perette Barella)</managingEditor>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:54:07 -0400</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<link>http://perette.barella.org/Journal/journal-2010.html#L201009011641</link>
<guid>http://perette.barella.org/Journal/journal-2010.html#L201009011641</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:41:00 -0400</pubDate>
<author>perette@barella.org (Perette Barella)</author>
<title> Big f'ing heads-up on X-UA-Compatible</title>
<description>&lt;P&gt;
The X-UA-Compatible setting for IE behaves strange when you request
IE=8 or IE-8=edge.  You would think requesting 8 &amp;amp; up would imply
standards mode. In reality it may or may not, instead switching
to quirks mode based on the DOCTYPE as follows:

&lt;PRE&gt;
  - If DOCTYPE is 4.01 strict, it uses the standard mode rendering engine.
    &amp;lt;!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC &amp;quot;-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN&amp;quot;&amp;gt;
    &amp;lt;!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC &amp;quot;-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN&amp;quot;
                          &amp;quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;
&lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;
  - If DOCTYPE is 4.01 transitional, and the DOCTYPE is present in full,
    unabridged form, it will also use the standard mode rendering engine.
    &amp;lt;!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC &amp;quot;-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN&amp;quot;
			  &amp;quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;
&lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;
  - If DOCTYPE is 4.01 transitional but abridged, it will use quirks mode.
    &amp;lt;!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC &amp;quot;-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN&amp;quot;&amp;gt;
&lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;P&gt;
So what the hell was the point of X-UA-Compatible if it's ignored
sometime?  Don't ask me, it's Microsoft.</description>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://perette.barella.org/Journal/journal-2010.html#L201008222359</link>
<guid>http://perette.barella.org/Journal/journal-2010.html#L201008222359</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 23:59:00 -0400</pubDate>
<author>perette@barella.org (Perette Barella)</author>
<title> Reason, Intuition, and Religious Tolerance</title>
<description>&lt;P&gt;
A friend acused me of being intolerant, which got me to thinking, and
like I often do I started writing and thinking to sort out my feelings.
It took a good chunk of a month and a lot of thinking, but
I finally finished &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://perette.barella.org/Science/reason-intuition-religion.html&quot;&gt;Reason, Intuition, and Religious Tolerance&lt;/A&gt;.
Sorry for the length, but there were a lot of intertwined and related thoughts.

&lt;P&gt;
Also, I haven't received any good reason to stay with Facebook, so I'll
be ditching that RSN.  Those really bent on keeping up with me can
read &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://perette.barella.org/Journal/&quot;&gt;my journal&lt;/A&gt;, which has an RSS
feed available, or on &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://periperi.livejournal.com&quot;&gt;LJ&lt;/A&gt;.</description>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://perette.barella.org/Journal/journal-2010.html#L201008032204</link>
<guid>http://perette.barella.org/Journal/journal-2010.html#L201008032204</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 22:04:00 -0400</pubDate>
<author>perette@barella.org (Perette Barella)</author>
<title> To Facebook, or not to Facebook (RFC)</title>
<description>&lt;P&gt;
As many of y'all know, I'm not real keen on Facebook.  It's a privacy
nightmare from hell.  I've long been iffy about FB: it keeps finding
me a lot of people I've lost touch with, but does it really put me
in touch?  FB now demands I land on the News Feed, where I can see
all sorts of useless trivia about what people are up to.  And I've got
to ask myself: is this making my life better?

&lt;P&gt;
And recently, Facebook has some stupid new application that people
can make comments about me in, but I can only read them if I'm
willing to grant whatever disreputable app access to all my data.
If I did, would it make my life better?

&lt;P&gt;
As I've mentioned before, Facebook is the Roach Motel of social networking:
it collects data, then only gives it out when I'm at Facebook.  It doesn't
export an RSS feed or something that allows me to participate in interactions
in my own way.  Is there some way I'm not seeing that this makes my life better?

&lt;P&gt;
And it's only getting worse: you know those little &amp;quot;Like&amp;quot; buttons
that have recently appeared on web sites that allow you to show your
approval on FB?  Well, they're little iFrames, or at least some of
them are, which most of you probably don't care about.  Except that
it means not only is the web site you're visiting tracking you,
but FaceBook is tracking you.  Every site with a &amp;quot;Like&amp;quot; or other
FaceBook interface, all around the web.  So when you visit
my client &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://flexfitnessrochester.com&quot;&gt;Flex Gym and Aerobics&lt;/A&gt;,
not only can I track what you do there but now FaceBook can too.
And they implement the FaceBook interface in a way that they can
expand on it if they come up with better ways of tracking you.
Is all this tracking making my life better?

&lt;P&gt;
(And people used to think it was bad that Google has access to all those
search keywords I enter, and search results I click on.  Ha!)

&lt;P&gt;
In whatever period I've been a member on Facebook, it's only achieved
one cool thing that I can think of: I got together with a couple of the
cool people from my high school class.

&lt;P&gt;
Other than the one instance, the answer I keep coming back to, is that no,
Facebook and its useless apps and trivial &amp;quot;friendships&amp;quot; don't
make my life better.

&lt;P&gt;
I'm therefore tentatively looking at axing my account in September.
One other advantage I can see is that doing so would mean no longer
giving the pretense that I use Facebook, or having to think about
approving new acquaintances as friends.  It would release the
associated &amp;quot;web site handle&amp;quot;, the little chunk of resources that
are stay occupied by my continued presence on FB.  (This probably
seems trivial to others, but I like simplicity and when you start
looking at the number of sites I'm on-- FB, FetLife, a couple of
Yahoo groups, a Google Group, f'ing LinkedIn (which also gets on
my tits), 4 fetish forums for stuff I'm into,
and a handful of fetish forums related to some of my modeling, they
add up to a sort of &amp;quot;mental clutter&amp;quot;.  And for the record, FB isn't
the only one being considered for eviction from my life; there's
a Big Pruning in the works.)

&lt;P&gt;
FB is a big enough fish, though, I'm questioning whether it I'd just
find myself &amp;quot;out in the cold&amp;quot; or something.  So I'm open to discussion
or debate on the matter.  Comments can be sent to me via mail, or made
in response to this article on Facebook or on
&lt;A HREF=&quot;http://periperi.livejournal.com&quot;&gt;LiveJournal&lt;/A&gt;.</description>
</item>
</channel></rss>
